PAMC icon

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
PAMC

40.00 USD
+0.41
1.04%
At close Apr 17, 4:00 PM EDT
1 day
1.04%
5 days
3.76%
1 month
-6.17%
3 months
-16.93%
6 months
-15.13%
Year to date
-14.14%
1 year
-6.56%
5 years
66.60%
10 years
66.60%
0
Funds holding %
of 7,419 funds
–
Analysts bullish %

Fund manager confidence

Based on 2024 Q4 regulatory disclosures by fund managers ($100M+ AUM)

50% more first-time investments, than exits

New positions opened: 9 | Existing positions closed: 6

33% more repeat investments, than reductions

Existing positions increased: 12 | Existing positions reduced: 9

20% more capital invested

Capital invested by funds: $42.2M [Q3] → $50.6M (+$8.42M) [Q4]

11% more funds holding

Funds holding: 28 [Q3] → 31 (+3) [Q4]

5.36% more ownership

Funds ownership: 67.21% [Q3] → 72.57% (+5.36%) [Q4]

0% more funds holding in top 10

Funds holding in top 10: 1 [Q3] → 1 (+0) [Q4]

See Fund Rankings

Research analyst outlook

We haven’t received any recent analyst ratings for PAMC.

See Analyst Rankings

Financial journalist opinion

Positive
Seeking Alpha
1 month ago
PAMC: Is Pacer Lunt's Mid-Cap Factor Rotation ETF Worth Buying?
PAMC selects mid-cap stocks based on a factor rotation strategy involving high or low momentum, quality, value, and volatility. PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio and $75 million in assets. The strategy is proprietary, but I believe key inputs are yield changes. The sharp increase from September to January coincides with PAMC's rotation to low quality, highly volatile stocks. PAMC has outperformed its benchmark, but its win rate is only 51.8%, casting doubt on the strategy's long-term usefulness. Furthermore, its success is mainly due to emphasizing the momentum factor.
PAMC: Is Pacer Lunt's Mid-Cap Factor Rotation ETF Worth Buying?
See News Rankings
Charts implemented using Lightweight Charts™